How it works

From AI activity to an evidence-backed decision.

GrundMind starts with a business question, not a software rollout. We collect the evidence needed to explain the current state, identify what should change, and give leadership a basis for deciding what to do next.

The engagement

Six steps. One continuous evidence chain.

The sequence can be used before an AI rollout, during a pilot, or after investment has already been made and leadership needs to understand the outcome.
01

Scope

Start with one decision leadership needs to make.

Define the team, workflow, AI tools, business question and intended outcomes.

Agree what evidence would be useful before the assessment starts.

02

Collect evidence

Capture the system from more than one point of view.

Employees and managers complete role-appropriate assessments; their evidence remains separate.

Where available, workflow context and outcome evidence are added to the interpretation.

03

Diagnose

Find the condition behind the outcome.

Generate the Five-Fit view, evidence coverage, Human–AI interaction patterns and Missing ROI diagnosis where mapped.

Compare manager and team perspectives without averaging contradictions away.

04

Decide

Turn findings into a small number of leadership choices.

Identify what to stop, redesign, clarify, measure or support first.

Publish a reviewed executive diagnosis and prioritized action sequence.

05

Intervene

Change the work, not just the messaging.

Test practical workflow, governance, enablement or role changes where the evidence points.

GrundMind can support implementation, or the client can execute the actions internally or with an implementation partner.

06

Remeasure

Ask whether the condition actually changed.

Repeat the relevant evidence collection after an agreed period or intervention.

Compare the new result with the prior snapshot and decide whether to retain, redesign or expand the approach.

No forced scale

A weak or unclear pilot is a reason to investigate, not a reason to push the same pattern across more teams.

No guaranteed ROI claim

GrundMind diagnoses the conditions around AI value. Business outcomes still depend on the intervention, implementation and operating context.

No averaged disagreement

Manager and employee perspectives remain distinct so leadership can investigate real gaps rather than smooth them away.

Start with one team

A pilot is designed to answer a question, not to prove GrundMind right.

The aim is to get enough real evidence to make a useful decision while keeping the initial commitment contained.
01

One-team pilot

Start small enough to inspect the evidence, not with a company-wide survey for its own sake.

02

Employee + manager view

Capture experience from the people doing the work and the people responsible for enabling it.

03

Executive readout

Receive the diagnosis, evidence limits, priority actions and questions that still need validation.

04

Optional follow-through

Use GrundMind, your internal team or an implementation partner to test the recommended changes.

The decision point

The report is not the end of the work. It is where the next decision becomes clearer.

A GrundMind result should tell leadership what the evidence supports, what remains uncertain, what is likely constraining value and what can be tested next. Some clients will implement the recommendations themselves; others may want GrundMind or a delivery partner alongside them.

Decision loop
EvidenceDiagnosisChangeRemeasure
Discovery call

Find out where AI value is getting lost.

If AI is already in use but the business impact is unclear, GrundMind helps you see where value is being created, where it is leaking, why, and what to fix first.